최신IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/Asia (CIPP/A) - CIPP-A무료샘플문제
SCENARIO - Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
Delilah is seeking employment in the marketing department of Good Mining Private Limited, an industry leader in drilling mines in Singapore. Delilah, while filling in the standard paper application form, is asked to provide details about emergency contacts, medical history, blood type and her insurance policy. These fields need to be filled in no matter which department Delilah applies to. The form also asks Delilah to expressly consent to the collection, use and disclosure of her personal data.
A week after submitting the form, Delilah is invited by Evan, the Director of Marketing at Good Mining, to coffee. Just before Delilah leaves, she gives her business card containing her current business contact information to Evan. Evan then uses the business card to add Delilah's details to Good Mining's business development database, which is kept on a local server. Good Mining uses the database to inform people about networking and client events that Good Mining organizes.
Why is Good Mining Private's standard form NOT compliant with Singapore's data protection law?
In India's IT Rules 2011, which is included in the definition of "sensitive personal data"?
How was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Maneka Gandhi v Union of India case significant to Indian law?
In 2015, Section 66A of India's IT Act was ruled unconstitutional. What did this section previously prohibit?
How is the transparency of the complaint process treated in both Hong Kong and Singapore?
Hong Kong's New Guidance on Direct Marketing clarified that direct marketing rules under the new regime do NOT apply if what condition exists?
In what case would a foreign company NOT be liable for breaches of Singapore's PDPA?
SCENARIO - Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
Fitness For Everyone ("FFE") is a gym on Hong Kong Island that is affiliated with a network of gyms throughout Southeast Asi a. When prospective members of the gym stop in, call in or submit an inquiry online, they are invited for a free trial session. At first, the gym asks prospective clients only for basic information: a full name, contact number, age and their Hong Kong ID number, so that FFE's senior trainer Kelvin can reach them to arrange their first appointment.
One day, a potential customer named Stephen took a tour of the gym with Kelvin and then decided to join FFE for six months. Kelvin pulled out a registration form and explained FFE's policies, placing a circle next to the part that read "FEE and affiliated third parties" may market new products and services using the contact information provided on the form to Stephen "for the duration of his membership." Stephen asked if he could opt-out of the marketing communications. Kelvin shrugged and said that it was a standard part of the contract and that most gyms have it, but that even so Kelvin's manager wanted the item circled on all forms. Stephen agreed, signed the registration form at the bottom of the page, and provided his credit card details for a monthly gym fee. He also exchanged instant messenger/cell details with Kelvin so that they could communicate about personal training sessions scheduled to start the following week.
After attending the gym consistently for six months, Stephen's employer transferred him to another part of the Island, so he did not renew his FFE membership.
One year later, Stephen started to receive numerous text messages each day from unknown numbers, most marketing gym or weight loss products.
Suspecting that FFE shared his information widely, he contacted his old FFE branch and asked reception if they still had his information on file. They did, but offered to delete it if he wished. He was told FFE's process to purge his information from all the affiliated systems might take 8 to 12 weeks. FFE also informed him that Kelvin was no longer employed by FFE and had recently started working for a competitor. FFE believed that Kelvin may have shared the mobile contact details of his clients with the new gym, and apologized for this inconvenience.
Which of the following practices would likely violate Hong Kong's Data Protection Principle 1 regarding data collection?
Besides the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), which of the following is a potential source of privacy protection for Singapore citizens?
In Hong Kong, which of the following are exempt from personal data access requests until after the project to which the data is related has been concluded?